Holger Levsen · Holger Levsen · Holger Levsen · Holger Levsen · Holger Levsen · Holger Levsen
--- a/TODO
+++ b/TODO
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ wishlist! And see the bottom of this file for wishlist bugs someone once
 expressed…


-for 0.8x, during the buster development cycle:
+Some stuff we might tackle for 0.9x, during the buster development cycle:

- fix policy reference for old footnote 53, blocked by #879048
+- do an 1.0.0 release, it's about time since 10 years :)

 - README_server.txt: rewrite style a bit more. its super easy to setup now!

@@ -27,10 +27,6 @@ for 0.8x, during the buster development cycle:
    on the master arch to slaves of different archs ->
    "schedule-evenly-to-slaves = no"

- once that works, update README_pejacevic: search for "soon shall go into operation..."
-
- piuparts-master: keep track of to whom a reservation was given
-
 - more stats and graphs:
  - new section stats page:
    - packages processed per day and section, master writes submissions.txt
@@ -44,10 +40,6 @@ for 0.8x, during the buster development cycle:
  If master does that remove that sentence from README_server.txt again,
  same with slave and tmp.

- piuparts.conf.pejacevic: maybe use mirror via nfs (faster)
-
- maybe compress all logfiles
-
 - if it weren't for 'slave-bin/slave_cleanup', the slave would only need
  rights to run "sudo piuparts" but nothing else. If we can clean this up,
  the sudoers.d should recommend sudo (lsof|kill|umount) for admins.
@@ -95,7 +87,13 @@ for 0.8x, during the buster development cycle:
  (piuparts), adopting apt's naming


-for 0.9x and later:
+Ideas for 1.0.x and later:
+
+- piuparts.conf.pejacevic: maybe use mirror via nfs (faster)
+
+- maybe compress all logfiles
+
+- piuparts-master: keep track of to whom a reservation was given

 - install from git/Makefile: remove the need for /etc/piuparts

@@ -121,19 +119,11 @@ for 0.9x and later:
  be nice


-for 1.xx and later:
-
- find_default_debian_mirrors:
-  - check whether find_default_debian_mirrors produces something useful if
-    sources.list does not exist (and sources.list.d/*.list is there instead)
-  - maybe just copy sources.list(.d/*) instead?
+More ideas for even later:

 - make it possible to call aptitude (or similar) instead of apt-get and allow to
  override the commandline arguments.

- mount perhaps others (usbfs, sysfs, etc.) in the chroot
-  might be a good idea because some packages might need this.
-
 - rewrite piuparts-analyze to run over all sections and cache BTS responses

 - "decorate" (strike-through) bug links generated by piuparts-analyze to

--- a/bug-templates/copyright_file_missing_after_upgrade.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/copyright_file_missing_after_upgrade.mail
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Hi,

 a test with piuparts revealed that your package misses the copyright
 file after an upgrade, which is a violation of Policy 12.5:
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#copyright-information
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#copyright-information

 After the upgrade /usr/share/doc/$PACKAGE/ is just an empty directory.

@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ https://wiki.debian.org/MissingCopyrightFile
 Note that dpkg intentionally does not replace directories with symlinks
 and vice versa, you need the maintainer scripts to do this.
 See in particular the end of point 4 in
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-unpack-phase-of-installation-or-upgrade
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#details-of-unpack-phase-of-installation-or-upgrade

 It is recommended to use the dpkg-maintscript-helper commands
 'dir_to_symlink' and 'symlink_to_dir' (available since dpkg 1.17.14)

--- a/bug-templates/doesnt_use_invoke-rc.d.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/doesnt_use_invoke-rc.d.mail
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ during a test with piuparts I noticed your package starts processes
 where it shouldn't. This is very probably due to not using invoke-rc.d
 as mandated by policy 9.3.3.2. This is seriously disturbing! ;-)

-See https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#interfacing-with-init-systems
+See https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#interfacing-with-init-systems
 and /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.invoke-rc.d.gz as well
 as /usr/share/doc/sysv-rc/README.policy-rc.d.gz


--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_install_trying_to_overwrite_other_packages_files.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_install_trying_to_overwrite_other_packages_files.mail
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
 Breaks+Replaces relation.

 See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

 From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):


--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite files that are owned by other packages
 without declaring a Breaks+Replaces relation.

 See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

 This problem is exposed during the upgrade of the 'EXPOSER'
 package, not by upgrading only the buggy package itself.

--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_jessie_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_jessie_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
 Breaks+Replaces relation.

 See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

 From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):


--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_lenny_to_squeeze_to_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_lenny_to_squeeze_to_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ but then the upgrade to 'wheezy' failed because it tries to overwrite
 other packages files without declaring a Breaks+Replaces relation.

 See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

 From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):


--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
 Breaks+Replaces relation.

 See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

 From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):


--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_squeeze_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_squeeze_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
 Breaks+Replaces relation.

 See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

 From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):


--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_stable_to_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_stable_to_sid_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
 Breaks+Replaces relation.

 See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

 This test intentionally skipped 'testing' to find file overwrite
 problems before packages migrate from 'unstable' to 'testing'.

--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_stretch_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_stretch_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
 Breaks+Replaces relation.

 See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

 From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):


--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_testing_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_testing_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
 Breaks+Replaces relation.

 See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

 From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):


--- a/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/fails_to_upgrade_from_wheezy_-_trying_to_overwrite.mail
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ because it tries to overwrite other packages files without declaring a
 Breaks+Replaces relation.

 See policy 7.6 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces

 From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):


--- a/bug-templates/installs_over_existing_symlink.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/installs_over_existing_symlink.mail
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ It may break in subtle ways and dpkg cannot detect this as a problem.
  "win" and all others have "lost".
  Note that dpkg intentionally does not replace directories with
  symlinks and vice versa, see in particular the end of point 4 in
-  https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-unpack-phase-of-installation-or-upgrade
+  https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#details-of-unpack-phase-of-installation-or-upgrade
  (Note: Adding Pre-Depends is *not* a solution.)

 Please move the files shipped in your package to the "real" location.

--- a/bug-templates/leaves_alternatives_after_purge.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/leaves_alternatives_after_purge.mail
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ Hi,
 during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned files on
 the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8:

-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging

 The leftover files are actually alternatives that were installed by the
 package but have not been properly removed.

--- a/bug-templates/maintainer_script_unknown_argument.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/maintainer_script_unknown_argument.mail
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ during a test with piuparts I noticed the maintainer scripts of your
 package don't support all the ways they are going to be called.

 See policy 6.5 at
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#summary-of-ways-maintainer-scripts-are-called
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#summary-of-ways-maintainer-scripts-are-called

 From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):


--- a/bug-templates/modifies_conffiles.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/modifies_conffiles.mail
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Hi,

 during a test with piuparts I noticed your package modifies conffiles.
 This is forbidden by the policy, see
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#configuration-files
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#configuration-files

 10.7.3: "[...] The easy way to achieve this behavior is to make the
 configuration file a conffile. [...] This implies that the default

--- a/bug-templates/owned_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/owned_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ Hi,
 during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left owned files on
 the system after purge, which is a violation of policy 6.8 and 10.7.3:

-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#behavior
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#behavior

 From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):


--- a/bug-templates/owned_and_unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/owned_and_unowned_files_after_purge_policy_6.8_+_10.7.3.mail
@@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left owned and
 unowned files on the system after purge, which is a violation of
 policy 6.8 and 10.7.3:

-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
-https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#behavior
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-maintainerscripts.html#details-of-removal-and-or-configuration-purging
+https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-files.html#behavior

 From the attached log (scroll to the bottom...):


--- a/bug-templates/partial-upgrade-file-overwrite.mail
+++ b/bug-templates/partial-upgrade-file-overwrite.mail
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ The following relationships are currently defined:

 The following relationships should be added for a clean takeover of
 these files
-(https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces):
+(https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#overwriting-files-and-replacing-packages-replaces):

  Package:
  Breaks: