Skip to content
GitLab
Unverified Commit b84b9263 authored by Enrico Zini's avatar Enrico Zini
Browse files

Use Inconsistency tracking in CheckLDAPConsistency. Fixes:

parents bd61f3ca 769cc8c9
Hide whitespace changes
Inline Side-by-side
.gitlab-ci.yml
View file @ b84b9263
...@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@ ...@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
gnupg gnupg
debian-keyring debian-keyring
python3-git python3-git
python3-testfixtures
libjs-bootstrap4 libjs-bootstrap4
fonts-fork-awesome fonts-fork-awesome
libjs-jquery-datatables libjs-jquery-datatables
......
dsa/housekeeping.py
View file @ b84b9263
...@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ from django.utils.timezone import now ...@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ from django.utils.timezone import now
from backend.housekeeping import MakeLink, Housekeeper from backend.housekeeping import MakeLink, Housekeeper
from . import udldap from . import udldap
from backend import const from backend import const
from sitechecks.models import Inconsistency
import backend.models as bmodels import backend.models as bmodels
import process.models as pmodels import process.models as pmodels
import backend.ops as bops import backend.ops as bops
...@@ -140,8 +141,10 @@ class CheckLDAPConsistency(hk.Task): ...@@ -140,8 +141,10 @@ class CheckLDAPConsistency(hk.Task):
fpr = entry.single("keyFingerPrint") fpr = entry.single("keyFingerPrint")
if fpr: if fpr:
log.warn("%s: %s has fingerprint %s and gid %s in LDAP, but is not in our db", Inconsistency.objects.found(
self.IDENTIFIER, entry.uid, fpr, entry.single("gidNumber")) self.IDENTIFIER,
f"{entry.uid} has fingerprint {fpr} and gid {entry.single('gidNumber')} in LDAP,"
" but is not in our db")
else: else:
ldap_fields_args = { ldap_fields_args = {
"cn": entry.single("cn"), "cn": entry.single("cn"),
...@@ -199,9 +202,12 @@ class CheckLDAPConsistency(hk.Task): ...@@ -199,9 +202,12 @@ class CheckLDAPConsistency(hk.Task):
elif not entry.is_dd: elif not entry.is_dd:
# mom040267 has a locked account (see the FD comments on the site) # mom040267 has a locked account (see the FD comments on the site)
if person.ldap_fields.uid != "mom040267": if person.ldap_fields.uid != "mom040267":
log.warn("%s: %s has accountStatus '%s' (comment: %s) but in our db the state is %s", Inconsistency.objects.found(
self.IDENTIFIER, self.hk.link(person), entry.single("accountStatus"), self.IDENTIFIER,
entry.single("accountComment"), const.ALL_STATUS_DESCS[person.status]) f"person has accountStatus '{entry.single('accountStatus')}'"
f" (comment: {entry.single('accountComment')})"
f" but in our db the state is {const.ALL_STATUS_DESCS[person.status]}",
person=person)
if entry.is_dd: if entry.is_dd:
# if person.status not in (const.STATUS_REMOVED_DD, const.STATUS_EMERITUS_DD): # if person.status not in (const.STATUS_REMOVED_DD, const.STATUS_EMERITUS_DD):
...@@ -210,26 +216,36 @@ class CheckLDAPConsistency(hk.Task): ...@@ -210,26 +216,36 @@ class CheckLDAPConsistency(hk.Task):
if person.status_changed > self.email_forwarding_cutoff: if person.status_changed > self.email_forwarding_cutoff:
if dsa_status == "retiring" and person.status != const.STATUS_EMERITUS_DD: if dsa_status == "retiring" and person.status != const.STATUS_EMERITUS_DD:
log.warn("%s: %s has accountStatus '%s' (comment: %s) but in our db the state is %s [retiring]", Inconsistency.objects.found(
self.IDENTIFIER, self.hk.link(person), entry.single("accountStatus"), self.IDENTIFIER,
entry.single("accountComment"), const.ALL_STATUS_DESCS[person.status]) f"person has accountStatus '{entry.single('accountStatus')}'"
f" (comment: {entry.single('accountComment')})"
f" but in our db the state is {const.ALL_STATUS_DESCS[person.status]} [retiring]",
person=person)
if dsa_status == "inactive" and person.status != const.STATUS_REMOVED_DD: if dsa_status == "inactive" and person.status != const.STATUS_REMOVED_DD:
log.warn("%s: %s has accountStatus '%s' (comment: %s) but in our db the state is %s [inactive]", Inconsistency.objects.found(
self.IDENTIFIER, self.hk.link(person), entry.single("accountStatus"), self.IDENTIFIER,
entry.single("accountComment"), const.ALL_STATUS_DESCS[person.status]) f"person has accountStatus '{entry.single('accountStatus')}'"
f" (comment: {entry.single('accountComment')})"
f" but in our db the state is {const.ALL_STATUS_DESCS[person.status]} [inactive]",
person=person)
if dsa_status == "locked": if dsa_status == "locked":
parsed = entry.single("accountStatus").split() parsed = entry.single("accountStatus").split()
if len(parsed) == 1: if len(parsed) == 1:
log.warn("%s: %s has accountStatus '%s' (comment: %s) locked with no date", Inconsistency.objects.found(
self.IDENTIFIER, self.hk.link(person), entry.single("accountStatus"), self.IDENTIFIER,
entry.single("accountComment")) f"person has accountStatus '{entry.single('accountStatus')}'"
f"(comment: {entry.single('accountComment')}) locked with no date",
person=person)
else: else:
if dsa_status_date is not None and dsa_status_date < self.email_forwarding_cutoff.date(): if dsa_status_date is not None and dsa_status_date < self.email_forwarding_cutoff.date():
log.warn("%s: %s has accountStatus '%s' (comment: %s) locked for longer than 6 months", Inconsistency.objects.found(
self.IDENTIFIER, self.hk.link(person), entry.single("accountStatus"), self.IDENTIFIER,
entry.single("accountComment")) f"person has accountStatus '{entry.single('accountStatus')}'"
f" (comment: {entry.single('accountComment')}) locked for longer than 6 months",
person=person)
def run_main(self, stage): def run_main(self, stage):
# Prefetch people and index them by uid # Prefetch people and index them by uid
...@@ -253,15 +269,19 @@ class CheckLDAPConsistency(hk.Task): ...@@ -253,15 +269,19 @@ class CheckLDAPConsistency(hk.Task):
try: try:
dsa_status_date = datetime.datetime.strptime(parsed[1], "%Y-%m-%d").date() dsa_status_date = datetime.datetime.strptime(parsed[1], "%Y-%m-%d").date()
except ValueError: except ValueError:
log.warn("%s: %s has accountStatus '%s' (comment: %s) with unparsable date", Inconsistency.objects.found(
self.IDENTIFIER, self.hk.link(person), entry.single("accountStatus"), self.IDENTIFIER,
entry.single("accountComment")) "person has accountStatus '{entry.single('accountStatus')}'"
" (comment: {entry.single('accountComment')}) with unparsable date",
person=person)
dsa_status_date = None dsa_status_date = None
else: else:
dsa_status_date = None dsa_status_date = None
if dsa_status not in ("retiring", "inactive", "memorial", "locked", "renamed"): if dsa_status not in ("retiring", "inactive", "memorial", "locked", "renamed"):
log.warn("%s: %s has unknown accountStatus %s", Inconsistency.objects.found(
self.IDENTIFIER, self.hk.link(person), entry.single("accountStatus")) self.IDENTIFIER,
"person has unknown accountStatus {entry.single('accountStatus')}",
person=person)
else: else:
self.check_account_status(person, entry, dsa_status, dsa_status_date) self.check_account_status(person, entry, dsa_status, dsa_status_date)
else: else:
...@@ -269,14 +289,18 @@ class CheckLDAPConsistency(hk.Task): ...@@ -269,14 +289,18 @@ class CheckLDAPConsistency(hk.Task):
# DDs we don't expect # DDs we don't expect
if entry.is_dd: if entry.is_dd:
if person.status not in (const.STATUS_DD_U, const.STATUS_DD_NU): if person.status not in (const.STATUS_DD_U, const.STATUS_DD_NU):
log.warn("%s: %s has supplementaryGid 'Debian', but in our db the state is %s", Inconsistency.objects.found(
self.IDENTIFIER, self.hk.link(person), self.IDENTIFIER,
const.ALL_STATUS_DESCS[person.status]) "person has supplementaryGid 'Debian',"
f" but in our db the state is {const.ALL_STATUS_DESCS[person.status]}",
person=person)
else: else:
if person.status in (const.STATUS_DD_U, const.STATUS_DD_NU): if person.status in (const.STATUS_DD_U, const.STATUS_DD_NU):
log.warn("%s: %s has no supplementaryGid 'Debian', but in our db the state is %s", Inconsistency.objects.found(
self.IDENTIFIER, self.hk.link(person), self.IDENTIFIER,
const.ALL_STATUS_DESCS[person.status]) "person has no supplementaryGid 'Debian',"
f" but in our db the state is {const.ALL_STATUS_DESCS[person.status]}",
person=person)
email = entry.single("emailForward") email = entry.single("emailForward")
if email != person.ldap_fields.email: if email != person.ldap_fields.email:
......
dsa/tests/test_housekeeping.py
View file @ b84b9263
...@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ from dsa.housekeeping import CheckLDAPConsistency ...@@ -5,8 +5,8 @@ from dsa.housekeeping import CheckLDAPConsistency
from backend.models import Person from backend.models import Person
import backend.const as const import backend.const as const
from process.models import Process from process.models import Process
from sitechecks.models import Inconsistency
from unittest import mock from unittest import mock
from testfixtures import LogCapture
class MockHousekeeper: class MockHousekeeper:
...@@ -16,6 +16,12 @@ class MockHousekeeper: ...@@ -16,6 +16,12 @@ class MockHousekeeper:
def link(self, person): def link(self, person):
return str(person.ldap_fields.uid or person.pk) return str(person.ldap_fields.uid or person.pk)
def run(self, cls, stage: str = "main"):
task = cls(self)
task.IDENTIFIER = f"test.{cls.__name__}"
getattr(task, f"run_{stage}")(None)
return task
class MockEntry: class MockEntry:
def __init__(self, uid, **attrs): def __init__(self, uid, **attrs):
...@@ -34,16 +40,27 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase): ...@@ -34,16 +40,27 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase):
super().setUp() super().setUp()
self.hk = MockHousekeeper(self.persons.oldam) self.hk = MockHousekeeper(self.persons.oldam)
def assertInconsistenciesEqual(self, items):
res = list(Inconsistency.objects.all())
self.assertEqual(len(res), len(items))
for inc, item in zip(res, items):
if "person" in item:
self.assertEqual(inc.person, item["person"])
if "text" in item:
self.assertEqual(inc.text, item["text"])
def test_new_removed(self): def test_new_removed(self):
with mock.patch("dsa.udldap.list_people") as m: with mock.patch("dsa.udldap.list_people") as m:
m.return_value = [ m.return_value = [
MockEntry("newdd", supplementaryGid=["Debian"], cn="tcn", MockEntry("newdd", supplementaryGid=["Debian"], cn="tcn",
mn="tmn", sn="tsn", emailForward="test@example.org", accountStatus=None) mn="tmn", sn="tsn", emailForward="test@example.org", accountStatus=None)
] ]
with LogCapture() as lc: with self.assertLogs() as log:
task = CheckLDAPConsistency(self.hk) self.hk.run(CheckLDAPConsistency)
task.run_main(None) self.assertEqual(log.output, [
lc.check(("dsa.housekeeping", "WARNING", "None: newdd: created to mirror a removed DD account from LDAP")) "WARNING:dsa.housekeeping:test.CheckLDAPConsistency:"
" newdd: created to mirror a removed DD account from LDAP",
])
p = Person.objects.get(ldap_fields__uid="newdd") p = Person.objects.get(ldap_fields__uid="newdd")
audit = ["{}:{}".format(l.author.lookup_key, l.notes) for l in p.audit_log.all()] audit = ["{}:{}".format(l.author.lookup_key, l.notes) for l in p.audit_log.all()]
...@@ -64,11 +81,11 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase): ...@@ -64,11 +81,11 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase):
MockEntry("newguest", supplementaryGid=[], cn="tcn", mn="tmn", MockEntry("newguest", supplementaryGid=[], cn="tcn", mn="tmn",
sn="tsn", emailForward="test@example.org", accountStatus=None) sn="tsn", emailForward="test@example.org", accountStatus=None)
] ]
with LogCapture() as lc: with self.assertLogs() as log:
task = CheckLDAPConsistency(self.hk) self.hk.run(CheckLDAPConsistency)
task.run_main(None) self.assertEqual(log.output, [
lc.check(("dsa.housekeeping", "WARNING", "WARNING:dsa.housekeeping:test.CheckLDAPConsistency:"
"None: newguest: created to mirror a removed guest account from LDAP")) " newguest: created to mirror a removed guest account from LDAP"])
p = Person.objects.get(ldap_fields__uid="newguest") p = Person.objects.get(ldap_fields__uid="newguest")
audit = ["{}:{}".format(l.author.lookup_key, l.notes) for l in p.audit_log.all()] audit = ["{}:{}".format(l.author.lookup_key, l.notes) for l in p.audit_log.all()]
...@@ -90,12 +107,12 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase): ...@@ -90,12 +107,12 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase):
emailForward="test@example.org", keyFingerPrint="66B4DFB68CB24EBBD8650BC4F4B4B0CC797EBFAB", emailForward="test@example.org", keyFingerPrint="66B4DFB68CB24EBBD8650BC4F4B4B0CC797EBFAB",
accountStatus=None) accountStatus=None)
] ]
with LogCapture() as lc: self.hk.run(CheckLDAPConsistency)
task = CheckLDAPConsistency(self.hk) self.assertInconsistenciesEqual([
task.run_main(None) {"person": None,
lc.check(("dsa.housekeeping", "WARNING", "text": "newdd has fingerprint 66B4DFB68CB24EBBD8650BC4F4B4B0CC797EBFAB and gid 800 in LDAP,"
"None: newdd has fingerprint 66B4DFB68CB24EBBD8650BC4F4B4B0CC797EBFAB and gid 800 in LDAP," " but is not in our db"},
" but is not in our db")) ])
with self.assertRaises(Person.DoesNotExist): with self.assertRaises(Person.DoesNotExist):
Person.objects.get(ldap_fields__uid="newdd") Person.objects.get(ldap_fields__uid="newdd")
...@@ -106,16 +123,15 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase): ...@@ -106,16 +123,15 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase):
MockEntry("dd_u", supplementaryGid=["Debian"], cn="tcn", MockEntry("dd_u", supplementaryGid=["Debian"], cn="tcn",
mn="tmn", sn="tsn", emailForward="test@example.org", accountStatus=None) mn="tmn", sn="tsn", emailForward="test@example.org", accountStatus=None)
] ]
with LogCapture() as lc: with self.assertLogs() as log:
task = CheckLDAPConsistency(self.hk) self.hk.run(CheckLDAPConsistency)
task.run_main(None) self.assertEqual(log.output, [
lc.check( "INFO:dsa.housekeeping:test.CheckLDAPConsistency: dd_u changing email_ldap from dd_u@example.org"
("dsa.housekeeping", "INFO", "None: dd_u changing email_ldap from dd_u@example.org to test@example.org" " to test@example.org (source: LDAP)",
" (source: LDAP)"), 'INFO:dsa.housekeeping:test.CheckLDAPConsistency: dd_u changing cn from Dd_u to tcn (source: LDAP)',
('dsa.housekeeping', 'INFO', 'None: dd_u changing cn from Dd_u to tcn (source: LDAP)'), 'INFO:dsa.housekeeping:test.CheckLDAPConsistency: dd_u changing mn from to tmn (source: LDAP)',
('dsa.housekeeping', 'INFO', 'None: dd_u changing mn from to tmn (source: LDAP)'), 'INFO:dsa.housekeeping:test.CheckLDAPConsistency: dd_u changing sn from to tsn (source: LDAP)',
('dsa.housekeeping', 'INFO', 'None: dd_u changing sn from to tsn (source: LDAP)'), ])
)
p = self.persons.dd_u p = self.persons.dd_u
p.refresh_from_db() p.refresh_from_db()
...@@ -137,12 +153,10 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase): ...@@ -137,12 +153,10 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase):
MockEntry("dm", supplementaryGid=["Debian"], cn="Dm", mn="", sn="", emailForward="dm@example.org", MockEntry("dm", supplementaryGid=["Debian"], cn="Dm", mn="", sn="", emailForward="dm@example.org",
keyFingerPrint="66B4DFB68CB24EBBD8650BC4F4B4B0CC797EBFAB", accountStatus=None) keyFingerPrint="66B4DFB68CB24EBBD8650BC4F4B4B0CC797EBFAB", accountStatus=None)
] ]
with self.assertLogs() as log: self.hk.run(CheckLDAPConsistency)
task = CheckLDAPConsistency(self.hk) self.assertInconsistenciesEqual([
task.run_main(None) {"person": self.persons.dm,
self.assertEqual(log.output, [ "text": "person has supplementaryGid 'Debian', but in our db the state is Debian Maintainer"},
"WARNING:dsa.housekeeping:"
"None: dm has supplementaryGid 'Debian', but in our db the state is Debian Maintainer",
]) ])
p = self.persons.dm p = self.persons.dm
...@@ -156,13 +170,13 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase): ...@@ -156,13 +170,13 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase):
emailForward="dd_u@example.org", keyFingerPrint="66B4DFB68CB24EBBD8650BC4F4B4B0CC797EBFAB", emailForward="dd_u@example.org", keyFingerPrint="66B4DFB68CB24EBBD8650BC4F4B4B0CC797EBFAB",
accountStatus="inactive 2018-03-20"), accountStatus="inactive 2018-03-20"),
] ]
with self.assertLogs() as log: self.hk.run(CheckLDAPConsistency)
task = CheckLDAPConsistency(self.hk)
task.run_main(None) self.assertInconsistenciesEqual([
self.assertEqual(log.output, [ {"person": self.persons.dd_u,
"WARNING:dsa.housekeeping:" "text":
"None: dd_u has accountStatus 'inactive 2018-03-20' (comment: None)" "person has accountStatus 'inactive 2018-03-20' (comment: None)"
" but in our db the state is Debian Developer, uploading [inactive]", " but in our db the state is Debian Developer, uploading [inactive]"}
]) ])
p = self.persons.dd_u p = self.persons.dd_u
...@@ -177,12 +191,14 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase): ...@@ -177,12 +191,14 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase):
keyFingerPrint="66B4DFB68CB24EBBD8650BC4F4B4B0CC797EBFAB", keyFingerPrint="66B4DFB68CB24EBBD8650BC4F4B4B0CC797EBFAB",
accountStatus="inactive 2018-03-20", accountComment="RT#1234"), accountStatus="inactive 2018-03-20", accountComment="RT#1234"),
] ]
with self.assertLogs() as log:
task = CheckLDAPConsistency(self.hk) self.hk.run(CheckLDAPConsistency)
task.run_main(None) self.assertInconsistenciesEqual([
self.assertEqual(log.output, [ {"person": self.persons.dd_u,
"WARNING:dsa.housekeeping:None: dd_u has accountStatus 'inactive 2018-03-20' " "text":
'(comment: RT#1234) but in our db the state is Debian Developer, uploading [inactive]']) "person has accountStatus 'inactive 2018-03-20' "
'(comment: RT#1234) but in our db the state is Debian Developer, uploading [inactive]'}
])
p = self.persons.dd_u p = self.persons.dd_u
p.refresh_from_db() p.refresh_from_db()
...@@ -196,23 +212,21 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase): ...@@ -196,23 +212,21 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase):
MockEntry("dd_u", supplementaryGid=["Debian"], cn="Dd_u", mn="", sn="", MockEntry("dd_u", supplementaryGid=["Debian"], cn="Dd_u", mn="", sn="",
emailForward="dd_u@example.org", accountStatus="retiring 2018-03-20"), emailForward="dd_u@example.org", accountStatus="retiring 2018-03-20"),
] ]
with self.assertLogs() as log: self.hk.run(CheckLDAPConsistency)
task = CheckLDAPConsistency(self.hk) self.assertInconsistenciesEqual([
task.run_main(None) {"person": self.persons.dd_u,
self.assertEqual(log.output, [ "text": "person has accountStatus 'retiring 2018-03-20' "
"WARNING:dsa.housekeeping:None: dd_u has accountStatus 'retiring 2018-03-20' " '(comment: None) but in our db the state is Debian Developer, uploading '
'(comment: None) but in our db the state is Debian Developer, uploading ' '[retiring]'},
'[retiring]',
]) ])
process.approved_by = self.persons.dam process.approved_by = self.persons.dam
process.approved_time = now() process.approved_time = now()
process.save() process.save()
with self.assertLogs() as log: with self.assertLogs() as log:
task = CheckLDAPConsistency(self.hk) self.hk.run(CheckLDAPConsistency)
task.run_main(None)
self.assertEqual(log.output, [ self.assertEqual(log.output, [
"INFO:dsa.housekeeping:None: dd_u closed from dsa: retiring 2018-03-20", "INFO:dsa.housekeeping:test.CheckLDAPConsistency: dd_u closed from dsa: retiring 2018-03-20",
]) ])
p = self.persons.dd_u p = self.persons.dd_u
...@@ -234,24 +248,25 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase): ...@@ -234,24 +248,25 @@ class TestCheckLDAPConsistency(ProcessFixtureMixin, TestCase):
emailForward="test@example.org", accountStatus="retiring 2018-03-20"), emailForward="test@example.org", accountStatus="retiring 2018-03-20"),
] ]
with self.assertLogs() as log: with self.assertLogs() as log:
task = CheckLDAPConsistency(self.hk) self.hk.run(CheckLDAPConsistency)
task.run_main(None)
self.assertEqual(log.output, [ self.assertEqual(log.output, [
"WARNING:dsa.housekeeping:None: dd_u has accountStatus 'retiring 2018-03-20' " "INFO:dsa.housekeeping:test.CheckLDAPConsistency: dd_u changing email_ldap"
'(comment: None) but in our db the state is Debian Developer, uploading ' " from dd_u@example.org to test@example.org (source: LDAP)",
'[retiring]', ])
"INFO:dsa.housekeeping:None: dd_u changing email_ldap from dd_u@example.org to test@example.org" self.assertInconsistenciesEqual([
" (source: LDAP)", {"person": self.persons.dd_u,
"text": "person has accountStatus 'retiring 2018-03-20' "
'(comment: None) but in our db the state is Debian Developer, uploading '
'[retiring]'},
]) ])
process.approved_by = self.persons.dam process.approved_by = self.persons.dam
process.approved_time = now() process.approved_time = now()
process.save() process.save()
with self.assertLogs() as log: with self.assertLogs() as log:
task = CheckLDAPConsistency(self.hk) self.hk.run(CheckLDAPConsistency)
task.run_main(None)
self.assertEqual(log.output, [ self.assertEqual(log.output, [
"INFO:dsa.housekeeping:None: dd_u closed from dsa: retiring 2018-03-20", "INFO:dsa.housekeeping:test.CheckLDAPConsistency: dd_u closed from dsa: retiring 2018-03-20",
]) ])
p = self.persons.dd_u p = self.persons.dd_u
......
sitechecks/housekeeping.py
View file @ b84b9263
from __future__ import annotations
from collections import defaultdict from collections import defaultdict
import logging import logging
import django_housekeeping as hk import django_housekeeping as hk
......
sitechecks/models.py
View file @ b84b9263
from __future__ import annotations
from django.db import models from django.db import models
from backend.models import Person from backend.models import Person
from process.models import Process from process.models import Process
......
test-instance/deploy.yml
View file @ b84b9263
...@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@ ...@@ -48,7 +48,6 @@
- gnupg - gnupg
- debian-keyring - debian-keyring
- python3-git - python3-git
- python3-testfixtures
- libjs-bootstrap4 - libjs-bootstrap4
- fonts-fork-awesome - fonts-fork-awesome
- libjs-jquery-datatables - libjs-jquery-datatables
......
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment