Skip to content
Commits on Source (7)
......@@ -13,9 +13,17 @@ igv (2.4.14+dfsg-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
[ Olivier Sallou]
* d/patches/fix_gradle.patch: adapt build to Debian
// TODO there is still an issue with batik:
if defined, there are some conflicts
for other libs, they are found but marked as not visible....
* TODO there is still an issue with batik:
- if defined, there are some conflicts
(see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/42358084/package-conflicts-with-automatic-modules-in-java-9)
where some batik share some package names.
- for javafx libs, they are found but marked as not visible.... though
should be seen as unnamed modules.
javafx libs should be declared as modules with exported packages but
needs lib refactoring or we should find a way to put them as "standard"
libs and not modules (but how?)
-- Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org> Mon, 01 Oct 2018 21:14:39 +0200
......
......@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ Forwarded: no
requires htsjdk;
requires java.datatransfer;
requires java.desktop;
@@ -107,15 +107,15 @@
@@ -107,15 +107,10 @@
requires java.sql;
requires java.xml;
requires java.xml.bind;
......@@ -89,11 +89,6 @@ Forwarded: no
- requires javafx.fxml;
- requires javafx.graphics;
- requires javafx.swing;
+ requires javafx.baseEmpty;
+ requires javafx.controlsEmpty;
+ requires javafx.fxmlEmpty;
+ requires javafx.graphicsEmpty;
+ requires javafx.swingEmpty;
requires jdk.xml.dom;
- requires jfreechart;
+ requires jfreechart.debian;
......