Review for package htic
# Review for package htic
Stub to be developped.
Link to the pipeline run: Under Maintainer spaces
## Essential references:
- [Debian Policy 2.3 – Copyright considerations](https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#copyright-considerations)
- [Debian Policy 12.5 – Copyright information](https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile)
- [REJECT-FAQ][https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html]
## The package uses debhelper and is lintian-clean
This checklist assumes the above to ensure that some points of the Policy such as rules on when copyright files can be symbolic links, etc., are respected. If for some reason you accept to review a package that can not use these tools, read again Policy 12.5 very carefully and check all the points manually.
## The `debian/copyright` file contains:
- [x] A statement where the upstream sources were obtained ([Policy 12.5](https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile), Segment 3).
- [x] A name or contact address (email, forum, bugtracker, …) for the upstream authors (individuals or organisations) ([Policy 12.5](https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile), Segment 3).
- [x] The names of all copyright holders.
- the `copyright-grep` CI test can help you for text files.
- the `file-types` CI test can help you finding binary files that may contain copyright statements, such as images, PDFs, etc..
- [x] Year information for the copyright statements ([Jaspert-2006]).
- [x] A license statement for the packaging work in `debian/` ([Jaspert-2006]).
- [x] No extra information that belong to README files ([Policy 12.5](https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile), Segment 8).
- [x] A verbatim copy of the licenses ([Policy 2.3](https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-archive.html#copyright-considerations), Segment 1; [12.5](https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile), Segment 1), with the following exception:
- [x] For the Apache license (version 2.0), the Artistic license, the Creative Commons CC0-1.0 license, the GNU GPL (1, 2, or 3), the GNU LGPL (2, 2.1, or 3), the GNU FDL (1.2 or 1.3), and the Mozilla Public License (1.1 or 2.0), refer to the corresponding files under `/usr/share/common-licenses`, instead fully quoting ([Policy 12.5](https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile), Segment 7), and include the appropriate header ([Jaspert-2006][]).
- [x] For licensing information not written in the sources themselves, a mention about about and how the information was obtained (for example download link, email correspondance, …) ([REJECT-FAQ][])
- [ ] For packages _contrib_ or _non-free_: a statement that the package is not part of the Debian distribution and a brief explanation why ([Policy 12.5](https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-docs.html#s-copyrightfile), Segment 4).
[REJECT-FAQ]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/REJECT-FAQ.html
[Jaspert-2006]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/03/msg00023.html
issue