| ... | @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ The harms of this are obvious: diversion from focusing on already difficult enou |
... | @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ The harms of this are obvious: diversion from focusing on already difficult enou |
|
|
to needlessly complicated redundant and difficult compliance with very particular repository
|
|
to needlessly complicated redundant and difficult compliance with very particular repository
|
|
|
layout.
|
|
layout.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEP-14 might be a good idea only to small subset of packages but definitely not as default.
|
|
**DEP-14 might be a good idea only to small subset of packages but definitely not as default.**
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debian packaging repositories need no "debian/" name space for branches
|
|
Debian packaging repositories need no "debian/" name space for branches
|
|
|
unless that change is aimed to resolve conflicts with upstream branch
|
|
unless that change is aimed to resolve conflicts with upstream branch
|
| ... | @@ -61,4 +61,4 @@ I've found that in most cases having the following branches is enough: |
... | @@ -61,4 +61,4 @@ I've found that in most cases having the following branches is enough: |
|
|
* `buster-backports` (optional, when needed)
|
|
* `buster-backports` (optional, when needed)
|
|
|
* `buster` (optional)
|
|
* `buster` (optional)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusion: DEP-14 creates more problem than it aims to solve. |
|
**Conclusion: DEP-14 creates more problem than it aims to solve.** |
