Skip to content
GitLab
Explore
Sign in
Register
Primary navigation
Search or go to…
Project
R
reproducible-notes
Manage
Activity
Members
Labels
Code
Merge requests
Repository
Branches
Commits
Tags
Repository graph
Compare revisions
Build
Pipelines
Jobs
Pipeline schedules
Artifacts
Deploy
Releases
Model registry
Operate
Environments
Analyze
Value stream analytics
Contributor analytics
CI/CD analytics
Repository analytics
Model experiments
Help
Help
Support
GitLab documentation
Compare GitLab plans
Community forum
Contribute to GitLab
Provide feedback
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Snippets
Groups
Projects
Show more breadcrumbs
Reproducible Builds
reproducible-notes
Commits
4b8c998c
Commit
4b8c998c
authored
3 years ago
by
Daniel Shahaf
Browse files
Options
Downloads
Patches
Plain Diff
issues: dynstr_section_longer_by_two_bytes_which_are_NULs: Add some observations.
parent
293347a3
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
issues.yml
+14
-0
14 additions, 0 deletions
issues.yml
with
14 additions
and
0 deletions
issues.yml
+
14
−
0
View file @
4b8c998c
...
...
@@ -2326,3 +2326,17 @@ dynstr_section_longer_by_two_bytes_which_are_NULs:
description
:
|
The .dynstr section on the right build is longer by two bytes.
The value of those two bytes is 0x00 0x00.
.
stlink=1.7.0+ds-1 is currently in both bullseye and sid; is reproducible on
the former but not on the latter; and has this issue. The issue could be
caused by a difference in some build dependency between the two suites (for
some common build dependency of all packages having this issue); or by
a difference in the variations tested in the two suites.
.
The only difference in variations (per current "Variations tested" page) is
the build path variation.
.
So, is there any any chance that this issue is caused by the build path
variation? <wild speculation>Perhaps the number of extra bytes is 2
because the build path in build #2 is two bytes longer than in build
#1?</wild speculation>
This diff is collapsed.
Click to expand it.
Preview
0%
Loading
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Save comment
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment