2023-04-24-foss-north.se-R-B-the-first-10-years/index.html

@@ -144,6 +144,16 @@
         <img src="images/fn-logo.png" style="height: 70px;">
       </section>
 
+      <section>
+          <p style="font-size: 120%">
+		This talk is a work in progress.<br />
+		Apologies for that, but I felt it was needed (to continue to) document the history
+		of Reproducible Builds.<br />
+		So this talk is an early beta release. I hope you'll enjoy it!
+		<br />
+          </p>
+      </section>
+
       <section>
           <p style="font-size: 120%"><em>
 Maybe the talk title should have been:<br> <u>my</u> first 10 years with reproducible builds
@@ -163,7 +173,8 @@ And the idea is also much older than 10 years...
 	</em>
           </p>
       </section>
-      <!--========================================================= -->
+
+       <!--========================================================= -->
 
 
 

2023-04-24-foss-north.se-R-B-the-first-10-years/todo

 TODO:
 
-summits
-	participating projects 
+mention my 2014 motivation: kernel uploads to oldstable
+mention r-b benefit: increased development speed, less developer time wasted on build results
 
-arch rebuilders
-snapshot
-
-
-debconf talks
-
-/docs/history 
-
-S_D_E
-build path variations
-all the rest
-
-SBOM
-- slide about SBOM: not related to r-b but without r-b it's rather meaningless. "just a promise".
-
-- link fedora makro
-- explain S_D_E
-- explain predictable build pathes
-
-- refer to other talks:
-  - 2015 fosdem has a long list of issues
-  - thread model much better explained by lamby
-- slide?: change my mind - or after certain statements (single apps r-b usefulness)
 - slide?: bootstrapable.org - this is limited to software. reproducible hardware & free & reproducible firmware...
 - say thanks to sponsors, one has even been from Göteburg: mullvad