Loading _events/paris2018/report.md +3 −3 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ Sources Trust & Delivery - What constitutes a proff of reproducibility? - What constitutes a proof of reproducibility? - How do we distinguish or attest that an artifact was built on trusted hardware or in a trusted environment? Loading Loading @@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ Hash of package? buildinfo? Not all projects have buildinfo files Are .buildinfo files without binary checksums useless? (Archlinux has Are .buildinfo files without binary checksums useless? (Arch Linux has those) Is it enough / useful if rebuilders publish a stripped down version of Loading Loading @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ become a problem <a name="Toc11382_331763073"></a> #### Cross distribution participation representatives from Archlinux, openSUSE, Guix, Nix, Alpine Linux, representatives from Arch Linux, openSUSE, Guix, Nix, Alpine Linux, Debian "package finder tool\" interface for searching infomation about Loading Loading
_events/paris2018/report.md +3 −3 Original line number Diff line number Diff line Loading @@ -753,7 +753,7 @@ Sources Trust & Delivery - What constitutes a proff of reproducibility? - What constitutes a proof of reproducibility? - How do we distinguish or attest that an artifact was built on trusted hardware or in a trusted environment? Loading Loading @@ -1490,7 +1490,7 @@ Hash of package? buildinfo? Not all projects have buildinfo files Are .buildinfo files without binary checksums useless? (Archlinux has Are .buildinfo files without binary checksums useless? (Arch Linux has those) Is it enough / useful if rebuilders publish a stripped down version of Loading Loading @@ -2046,7 +2046,7 @@ become a problem <a name="Toc11382_331763073"></a> #### Cross distribution participation representatives from Archlinux, openSUSE, Guix, Nix, Alpine Linux, representatives from Arch Linux, openSUSE, Guix, Nix, Alpine Linux, Debian "package finder tool\" interface for searching infomation about Loading
