nir/range-analysis: Adjust result range of exp2 to account for flush-to-zero
Fixes piglit tests (new in piglit!110): - fs-underflow-exp2-compare-zero.shader_test Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111308 Fixes: 405de7cc ("nir/range-analysis: Rudimentary value range analysis pass") Reviewed-by:Caio Marcelo de Oliveira Filho <caio.oliveira@intel.com> Most of the shaders affected are, unsurprisingly, in Unigine Heaven. All Gen6+ platforms had similar results. (Ice Lake shown) total instructions in shared programs: 16278207 -> 16278465 (<.01%) instructions in affected programs: 11374 -> 11632 (2.27%) helped: 0 HURT: 58 HURT stats (abs) min: 2 max: 13 x̄: 4.45 x̃: 4 HURT stats (rel) min: 0.54% max: 4.11% x̄: 2.42% x̃: 2.82% 95% mean confidence interval for instructions value: 3.77 5.13 95% mean confidence interval for instructions %-change: 2.19% 2.64% Instructions are HURT. total cycles in shared programs: 367134284 -> 367135159 (<.01%) cycles in affected programs: 81207 -> 82082 (1.08%) helped: 17 HURT: 36 helped stats (abs) min: 6 max: 356 x̄: 90.35 x̃: 6 helped stats (rel) min: 0.69% max: 21.45% x̄: 5.71% x̃: 0.78% HURT stats (abs) min: 4 max: 235 x̄: 66.97 x̃: 16 HURT stats (rel) min: 0.35% max: 27.58% x̄: 5.34% x̃: 1.09% 95% mean confidence interval for cycles value: -20.36 53.38 95% mean confidence interval for cycles %-change: -1.08% 4.67% Inconclusive result (value mean confidence interval includes 0). No changes on any earlier platforms. (cherry picked from commit 33ad2bab)
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment